Media
and advertising are a huge factor in the sexualization of early childhood and
this is not because children are learning about sex at a very young age, it is
because of the particular lessons and messages they are receiving about sex and
sexuality (Derman-Sparks, Edwards, and the NAEYC, 2010). These messages also impact how parents
perceive the nature of sex and sexuality for their children. It seems that the expectation to wear the
right clothes (which have become sexier and sexier at a much younger age), play
with the right toys for your gender, and have the right technology in order for
children to fit in (accepted by peers) is prevalent for children at a younger
age every year. I am more surprised at
how many parents are buying into the expectation and giving into it. I can only think that this is to ensure their
children are included in the harsh click that is childhood. Parents are the first line of defense for
their children to develop healthy positive self images without all the hype,
sex, and violence they are surrounded by from day to day. This is not an easy task when every doll is
in a pink box giving messages that boys shouldn’t play with dolls because pink
is a girl color or dolls are only for girls.
But then how are boys to learn how to be the nurturing fathers they can
be? The double standard of sexism in
early childhood trickles down from the surrounding grown-up society. Girls can wear pants, but boys cannot wear
dresses. If boys enjoy taking care of
their skin or like to dress nicely they are considered metro-sexual. And if a girl is rough around the edges she
is a tomboy. WHAT? All of these examples potentially lead others to question
gender and sexual orientation. Societies
expectation of gender to match sexual orientation is drilled into all of us at
a very young age through media and advertising who have gone one step further
in making “sexy” part of childhood (Derman-Sparks, Edwards, and the NAEYC,
2010). All of this provides very
negative experiences for early childhood and identity development. Fitting into the narrow categories that
society sets for sexuality excludes young children that enjoy exploring their
environment by setting a standard and rules that don’t allow girls to play with
blocks or don’t allow boys to dress up during PLAY. Have we been a society of adults so long that
we have forgotten that play is play, play is using our imaginations, play is
how we learn and understand the environment we live in? As an early childhood professional, this
thinking has only inspired me to play more with the children I work with. I like to play characters the children wouldn’t
expect me to play as a woman or girl…and I explore with them. Not only that, I tend to provide
non-traditional experiences for gender in our imaginary play and activities and
challenge the children to think. I hope
this inspires them to become critical thinkers as they learn, grow, and develop.
References
Derman-Sparks, L.,
Edwards, J. O., & National Association for the Education of Young
Children (2010). Anti-bias education for young children and ourselves.
Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
No comments:
Post a Comment